3 March 2013

Distributive Law | Set Theory Property Proof

Online proof of distributive law property - set theory.

distributive law  states that, For all sets A, B, and C,

Distributive law:-
AU (BC) = (AUB) (AUC)
A (BUC) = (AB) U (AC)


Proof

Subproof that (AB) ∩ C ⊆ (AC) ∪ (B C):


Suppose x ∈ (AB) ∩ C.
Then, by definition of intersection, x ∈ (AB) ∧ xC.
Then, x ∈ (AB) says xAxB. So, consider these as two cases:

Case xA:

Then, applying definition of "and" gives that xAxC.
So, by definition of intersection, xAC.
Next, by ∨ Introduction, we can say xACxBC. But this meets the definition of union, so we may conclude x ∈ (AC) ∪ (BC).

Case xB:

Then, applying definition of "and" gives that xBxC.
So, by definition of intersection, xBC.
Next, by ∨ Introduction, we can say xACxBC. But this meets the definition of union, so we may conclude x ∈ (AC) ∪ (BC).
In either case, x ∈ (AC) ∪ (BC). So, (AB) ∩ C ⊆ (AC) ∪ (BC).


Subproof that (AC) ∪ (BC) ⊆ (AB) ∩ C:


Suppose x ∈ (AC) ∪ (BC).
Then, by definition of union, x ∈ (AC) ∨ x ∈ (BC). So, we'll consider two cases:

Case x ∈ (AC):

Then, by definition of intersection, xAxC.
In particular (via ∧ Elimination), xA. We can apply ∨ Introduction to claim xAxB. So, by definition of union, xAB.
Also, we have that xC. Combining this with the last result gives xABxC. We can apply the definition of intersection to get x ∈ (AB) ∩ C.

Case x ∈ (B C):

Then, by definition of intersection, xBxC.
In particular (via ∧ Elimination), xB. We can apply ∨ Introduction to claim xAxB. So, by definition of union, xAB.
Also, we have that xC. Combining this with the last result gives xABxC. We can apply the definition of intersection to get x ∈ (AB) ∩ C.
In either case, x ∈ (AB) ∩ C. So, (AC) ∪ (BC) ⊆ (AB) ∩ C.
As we have (AB) ∩ C ⊆ (AC) ∪ (B C) and (AC) ∪ (BC) ⊆ (AB) ∩ C we may conclude (AB) ∩ C = (AC) ∪ (B C).

No comments:

Post a Comment